The Garret Tree
Saturday, May 14, 2005
  Ah Pentagon, what's in a name (Operation Matador)

The Pentagon, or Centcom, or someone named the current U.S. anti-insurgency offensive on the border between Iraq and Syria "Operation Matador."

The BBC says:
The US has said its forces have cleared an area in north-west Iraq of insurgents following a week-long operation codenamed Matador.

The Americans said they had killed more than 125 rebels, for the loss of nine of their own men.
And the BBC goes on to quote a U.S. spokesman as saying:

"During Operation Matador, marines, sailors and soldiers neutralised this sanctuary, killing more than 125 insurgents, wounding many others, and detaining 39 insurgents of intelligence value," the US military said in a statement.

So what's in a name, Oh Pentagon? There was, once, another "Operation Matador" and that was Britain's plan in late 1941 for a pre-emptive strike from Malaya into Thailand to stop a Japanese landing. British intelligence correctly predicted that the main Japanese forces under the command of Lt. Gen. Yamashita Tomoyuki would land at the Thai ports of Singora and Patani and then begin a lightning offensive down the highways into Malaya.

If Britain had moved troops into Thailand and taken the ports, it might have stalled the Japanese attempt to take Southeast Asia.

But, of course, it never happened. Neither London nor Malaya Command could make up their minds what to do as the Japanese threat increased. The Foreign Office didn't want to do anything that could trigger a war with Japan or offend Thailand.

The dithering over Matador meant that the front line British troops had conflicting objectives, either defending the Malayan border or an offensive into Thailand. In early December, 1941, London finally gave the commander-in-chief, Air Marshal Sir Robert Brooke-Popham orders that he could decide to launch Matador.

Brooke-Popham's decision day was December 7, 1941 (Malaya time). The British had recieved the first indications of the Japanese invasion fleet in the Gulf of Thailand at 2 p.m. December 6, 1941 (Malaya time). If Brooke Popham ordered Matador, it would take 24 hours for the British troops to reach the Thai ports. He dithered and consulted, then at 11 p.m. on December 7, 1941, Brooke-Popham postponed Matador, told the front line troops, the III Indian Corps, to be in defensive positions but be ready to execute Matador.

At that moment off Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, the USS Ward was searching for a possible Japanese submarine.

By then it was too late.

The first Japanese troops were spotted off Kota Bahru, Malaya, the third landing site at 11:45 p.m. December 7, 1941. It was 5:45 a.m. December 7, 1941, Hawaii time and the first two Japanese reconnaissance aircraft were taking off from the Japanese carriers to scout Pearl Harbor.

The first Japanese troops landed at Singora at 2 a.m. December 8, 1941, 7 a.m. in Oahu, the same moment that the U.S. Army radar truck at at Opana picked up the incoming Japanese attack force--and the men manning the radar were told it was a scheduled flight of B-17s.

Historians who study the Second World War in Southeast Asia have long debated what would have happened if Britain had authorized Matador and met the Japanese invasion force on the beaches and harbours of those two Thai cities.

So far the media reports show that the U.S. says their Matador is a success. It may be "mission accomplished" or it may not be.

But once again you have to wonder how the Pentagon choses the names for operations. After all in an alternate universe, if there had been a 1941 Operation Matador, what might have happened at Pearl Harbor?

Technorati Tags
, ,, , , ,

Links to this post

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home
I write in a renovated garret in my house in a part of Toronto, Canada, called "The Pocket." The blog is named for a tree can be seen outside the window of my garret.

My Photo
Name: Robin Rowland
Location: Toronto, Canada

I'm a Toronto-based writer, photographer, web producer, television producer, journalist and teacher. I'm author of five books, the latest A River Kwai Story: The Sonkrai Tribunal. The Garret tree is my blog on the writing life including my progress on my next book (which will be announced here some time in the coming months) My second blog, the Wampo, Nieke and Sonkrai follows the slow progress of my freelanced model railway based on my research on the Burma Thailand Railway (which is why it isn't updated that often) The Creative Guide to Research, based on my book published in 2000 is basically an archive of news, information and hints for both the online and the shoe-leather" researcher. (Google has taken over everything but there are still good hints there)

New blogs as of Sept. 2009
Robin's Weir
Tao of News

November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / November 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / August 2009 /

    follow me on Twitter

    A River Kwai Story
    A River Kwai Story
    The Sonkrai Tribunal